Quote from: TwitchySeal on December 08, 2019, 06:08:13 PM

Quote from: Quickseller on December 08, 2019, 05:50:44 PM

Quote from: TwitchySeal on December 08, 2019, 05:06:38 PM

Quote from: Quickseller on December 08, 2019, 03:42:54 PM

Instead of slinging mud at OgNasty endlessly, could you possibly explain what contract OgNasty violated?

Wth man. If you think I'm wrong just say so and explain why instead of vaguely implying everything I say is bullshit.

Your posts are full of innuendo but isnt evidence of wrongdoing. I dont think there is any question that OgN profited from his pirate pass through, or that investors lost money in his pass through. I think of it as similar to a peer to peer lending platform such as prosper people buy debt issued by the platform that is contingent on a specific loan being repaid by a specific borrower, the platform will collect a fee to service the loan and will profit even if the borrower doesnt pay.

You might argue it was unethical for OgN to participate in the pirate ponzi in the first place, but there were many other people also participating. You might also argue that OgN violated a bunch of SEC paperwork rules, but so do most things around here. The amount that OgN may have profited was a few thousand dollars, but it might be zero if he invested his own money in pirates ponzi.

I previously thought that your beef with OgN was that he was running a signature campaign for what turned out to be a shady casino as this is when your scrutiny of him started. But it doesnt look like you have extended those same concerns to yahoo who is running a campaign for an even more shady business that was known to be shady before the campaign started and that has been running for months. You also havent extended those standards to any of the people who have positive trust ratings who are participating in the campaign.

I would suggest that you find a contract, implied or explicit that OgN did not keep.

Please read what I wrote if you want to discuss it. It's clear you either haven't or you're intentionally making this thread more complicated than it needs to be. Start here.

My apologies, I had not seen that document. Although my criticism does stand with regards to your lack of calling out anyone involved in the yobit campaign..

Elsewhere in the deposition, transaction histories of all the account holders accounts are mentioned, but are not attached to the document. If you can find an account history of OgN's BS&T account, the last withdrawal(s) can be cross referenced to the blockchain (if the txid is not listed), and I will consider the probability if OgN actually received the withdrawal or not.

It was suggested by pirate40's lawyer that some pass-through 'lenders' were scammed by pass-through operators, although the article I read did not mention him offering evidence to support this.

The document you provided was a deposition of pirate40, who for obvious reasons is not the most reliable person. He also contradicted himself on the following page in where he testified to compared to what he told an SEC investigator via telephone previously. He testified that he first gave priority to new account holders, and then prioritized his long standing accounts, but he previously only said that he prioritized his long standing accounts.

I also reviewed posts of some others that pirate40 claimed to have paid in full, however, some never made any mention of pirate40, btc4domains posted that he lost money in the pirate ponzi, brendio posted multiple times that he had not received anything from pirate40, coin_toss tried to sell his BS&T account after he would have received payment. Imsaguy seems to imply that he was expecting a payout for his pass through, but it is unclear if he ever received a withdrawal, he did say in late August 2012 that he had not received anything.