Quote from: d5000 on December 11, 2019, 11:03:44 AM

Were the 39% measured in SLM? In this case, I would explicitly add that (e.g. "[...] that by the recent estimates provides up to 39% of yearly profit (measured in SLM)" [...]).

I think it's impossible to provide a profit figure in USD, BTC or other currencies, as we can't predict the price evolution. If SLM recovers from the dip caused by the recent large dump then it's likely that the profit for PoB or PoS minters buying SLM now could be much superior. But it can also the other way around.

Agreed, the 39% of profit is in SLM as we've calculated a few posts ago together with some member of community.

I'm not sure we should add that it's calculated in SLM as in crypto-world it's always calculated in the currency we are speaking about (and you explained very well why) and also because it's the right thing to avoid deceptive advertising, but in the same time the goal of advertising is to put forth the advantages of the advertised thing. If we make too much remarks, brackets and * than the reader will got distracted and the message won't pass.

However if we decide to add that specification I'm ready to edit the text. Just keep in mind that we've already put some demotivator in our text, so if we go on with demotivators at some point advertising may not make too much sense.

Quote from: eddycurrent on December 11, 2019, 11:16:32 AM

I had a bit of a look and it looks pretty good but the second to last sentence caught my eye. I wonder whether this, "Along with the unique mining algorithm Slimcoin offers the ASICs resistant CPU mining algorithm and PoS." Should instead read "Along with a unique mining mechanism, Slimcoin offers the ASICs resistant CPU mining algorithm dcrypt, and PoS at 10% (might want to check this)" I thought it would be good to actually mention the algorithm's name to interest people and I that using the word mechanism over algorithm would just make it a clearer distinction. Also, you may want to consider using the word minting over the word mining in some cases. Just some thoughts anyway. Feel free to ask for clarification if you need or to ignore if you think the original is more appropriate.

Thank you very much for your notes.

I'll edit my text in agreement to your thoughts and will be back with the new one, as many improvements were already added.

I'd like to ask: Do we have PoS at 10% or we need to check it?