I really don't know how much clearer I can make this:
At the end of the day, bounty campaigns operate like a business - you are employed by them to provide a service, and they pay you for your time (even if the payment is some utterly worthless token). They are free to stipulate any rules they wish, regardless of what the forum rules say.
The bottom line is an individual or company who is hiring people to perform a task is allowed to set the rules of that employment. If you don't like those rules, don't apply.
If a project is paying money to hire someone to do a job, then it is entirely up to them what metrics they use to select the person they are going to hire for said job, even if you think those metrics are flawed. You're not paying to hire the person, so why should you get a say in who they hire?
You don't get to dictate to campaigns who they can and cannot hire. End of story.
The only thing you have made clear is that
1. you are unable to debunk my points
2. you have motivation for CLAIMING they should be able to avoid transparent rules
3. you have no idea what you are talking about
You don't get to dictate what MOST scammers chose to do. That does not mean we should not change things so it is fairer and better for all members here.
PRETENDING you are allocating positions to the BEST posters and MOST trustworthy when you are clearly not is DECEPTION and pretty much scamming.
ONLY scammers and untrustworthy are afraid of transparent rules that are applied equally to all members.
Saying we have no control over this is wrong. If the board decides we want campaign managers to have transparent rules or else the projects are branded deliberate SCAMS then that is what can happen.
If you are refusing to have your actions scrutinized against then you are refusing for a reason. Refusing transparent rules is refusing scrutiny.
This is dangerous for honest members and pressure should be applied to campaigns and projects to makes sure they do. For the sake of all honest members here. This is UNDENIABLE.