This is exactly what I am talking about. A discrepancy in the numbers does not equal theft.
If you can actually disprove something specific I said, please do. Your 'A discrepancy in the numbers does not equal theft' defense is a true statement, but it doesn't directly address anything. Sometimes a discrepancy absolutely does prove theft. And sometimes, like in this case, it's just one piece of the big picture.
I'm going to keep editing out and ignoring all the bullshit assumptions and personal attacks from now on, btw.