Quote from: TECSHARE on December 13, 2019, 01:47:03 AM

Quote from: JayJuanGee on December 12, 2019, 07:12:38 PM

That is what you get, Tecshare, for attempting to confuse matters. You get confusion that you, yourself, caused, seemingly on purpose with your lame-ass attempt at creating a dinsingenuous summary that you were inaccurately striving to spin in your favor.

If you try to be a bit more genuine in your renditions of the conduct and statements of others, then maybe someone will feel sorry for you. Including me. Perhaps? Cheesy

But, here, you dug your own little hole (a victim of your own seeming success) and then you are complaining (largely off topic and irrelevantly and who gives any shits) about someone else pulling up the ladder. Difficult to feel sorry for that when we have other topics of the thread, which is largely the evidentiary relevance of various matters concerning OGNasty and if there is any accounting that needs to be done based on more recent evidentiary revelations or the extent that any of the new evidentiary revelations matter.

Attempting to confuse matters? I am sorry if you were confused,

I'm referring to your actions, not my state of thinking.

Quote from: TECSHARE on December 13, 2019, 01:47:03 AM

but I can't be responsible for every simpleton that wanders in and has trouble reading my words.

Yes. You seem to have trouble focusing on the topic, and you seem inclined to attack people who seem to NOT be fully lovey dovey with your goals and objectives to confuse matters in order to protect your lil buddy... and that is not even attempting to say anything negative about OGNasty, it is just referring to your ongoing distraction pitbull-like behaviors.

Quote from: TECSHARE on December 13, 2019, 01:47:03 AM

What was lame-ass was your original lazy opinion based on not even bothering to review the information fully, by your own admission, but still be willing to have a strong opinion about it.

I doubt my opinion was strong. I just was talking about the process that suggests reviewing evidence and logic to the extent that exists and is presented.

Quote from: TECSHARE on December 13, 2019, 01:47:03 AM

This is exactly what I was criticizing about TwitchySeal. He knows damn well most people aren't going to bother to look that close and he has a good chance of convincing people through repetition of his baseless theories operant conditioning style.

Oh? I see. Twitchy is a menace to the forum because he presents evidence and logic, and the forum members are too fucking stupid to understand that Twitchy is full of shit, and so therefore, Twitchy should not be presenting such evidence to all of us (forum member) dumb fucks... because we are too damned gullible. And furthermore, Twitchy is tricky as fuck for engaging in such manipulation. Shame on you Twitchy!!!!!

When I really consider what you are saying Tecshare, that makes a whole lot of sense.

NOT.

Quote from: TECSHARE on December 13, 2019, 01:47:03 AM

Combine this with the long term trend of himself and his buddies repeating this behavior clearly directed at OGNasty, and it becomes quite obvious this is about serving personal vendettas, not about righting any wrongs done.

You are so NOT very convincing in this regard. Evidence and logic is evidence and logic. Either it is convincing or it is not. Who knows how to resolve it, but members should be able to assess the information for themselves, and if any member has strong proposals or recommendations regarding what should be done or argued for in light of the evidence and arguments, then they should be free to make such assessments and to make whatever proposal, including the one that you are making (which is to drop the matter, but you are just one member, right?).

Quote from: TECSHARE on December 13, 2019, 01:47:03 AM

Why would I want you to feel sorry for me?

Hopefully, you don't want that.

Quote from: TECSHARE on December 13, 2019, 01:47:03 AM

What hole?

You got me? I don't know what hole you are referring to.

Quote from: TECSHARE on December 13, 2019, 01:47:03 AM

Why is it you rely on projection so much?

Did not realize that I was doing that.

Quote from: TECSHARE on December 13, 2019, 01:47:03 AM

Is it perhaps because you don't have any logical retort to what I said?

I don't know. I already responded to everything that seemed to be necessary to respond to.

You, Tecshare, sure do seem to have a tendency to devolve into a lot of irrelevant divergencies, including questioning my own competencies or whatever you had been attempting to do in your post.

Probably, I should apologize for responding to all of this seemingly irrelevant nonsense that Tecshare seems to be bringing up... but I tend to not be easily deterred.. regarding baloney talk... .. I might have to get a lesson from Nancy Reagan ("just say no"... ... hhahahahahahaha)...