Quote from: JayJuanGee on December 13, 2019, 07:13:17 PM

Quote from: The-One-Above-All on December 13, 2019, 06:09:25 PM

Quote from: TwitchySeal on December 13, 2019, 05:35:14 PM

[edited out]

Let's make this VERY SIMPLE

Striking away pirates claim

You are claiming you have CONCLUSIVE PROOF of clear and undeniable financially motivated wrong doing by OG nasty.

YES OR NO??

If you say YES and you do NOT have conclusive proof. That is defamation and lies according to DT precedent here. So you accept you should be flagged and tagged??

Did someone die and put you in charge of what are the forum/thread rules regarding discussion of topics, whether accusations or otherwise?

I doubt it. You seem to have about as much of a clue for proper and relevant forum/thread discussion(s) as a fruit fly. Maybe you are a fruit fly, disguising yourself as a forum member?

DT already set a precedent moron. THEIR RULES

Shhh fool. Nobody is going to fall for your cheap parlor tricks to derail this thread.

Twitchy clearly stated he has NO CONCLUSIVE PROOF OF FINANCIALLY MOTIVATED WRONG DOING. IT is merely speculation. However COMPELLING it seems DT members demand CONCLUSIVE IRREFUTABLE PROOF OF FINANCIALLY MOTIVATED WRONG DOING before you can speculate, insinuate or even ask questions or it is DEFAMATION, SPREADING LIES and you will all get red trust from each other LOL

What if after all of this he did pay it back from another account or somewhere else there is an explanation? where are these people that were scammed??

GO red trust all the other proven scammers that have undeniable observable instances of scamming, scam facilitating for pay and then we can come back to the ones we SPECULATE or it seems PROBABLE ( to some DT members that do not like OG being on DT) that have scammed after that.

I'm not saying OG is not enjoying a lavish lifestyle on others bitcoins he kept. I am saying you have NO CONCLUSIVE PROOF so stick to your own fucking self imposed standards and come back with it or by your own definitions you are DEFAMING him and spreading lies.

The timing and the specific members here is what makes it look extremely fishy to me. Not claiming there is no fire with your smoke just you need to find the fucking fire don't you. We supplied the fire and you never denied any of it. You just said bringing it up was defamation and spreading lies LOL. That was a question not even a clear accusation like many are making on this thread.

No more double standards here on this forum. You set precedents and hold to them. You must hold to them for all members.

/thread

come back with conclusive proof of financially motivated wrong doing or fuck off.

If you had enough for a type2 or 3 flag you would have pulled it by now. You do NOT. Of course red trust or the lemons flag is just a joke and proves NOTHING.

Hmmmm would I trust someone who just handed back 500 btc after years of being in SOLE control of it or a bunch of people that are undeniable scammers, or scammer supporters trying years after the event to drag anything up to get their main enemy removed from DT which they want sole control over???

HMMMM let me think.....hahaha

Twitchy if you had NOT been supporting and protecting scammers whilst shouting down whistle blowers and those that have been trust abused then perhaps it would have seemed less contrived and motivated to just pull OG off DT by any and all means. Same for this JJG windbag. It all just seems a little TOO convenient right now he just got back on DT and some of the scammers he tagged are getting some red on their accounts. I hope the campaign managers will be removing them soon or else we will be asking WHY THIS IS. Surely not MORE double standards LOL