Re: "The-One-Above-All" abuses self-moderated threads - Non-Reputable Behavior
[edited out]
LOL sorry you do not like the rules of the forum haha
Errr well when you are clearly siding and supporting these kinds of people...
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5170789.msg52014561#msg52014561
Sorry to see that you don't seem to understand engwish.
Regarding that above linked thread; I see that you are quite the self-entertained drama queen. Surprises me that you are allowed to propagate such - non-contributory content.
And claiming that people that are fighting for transparent fair rules that are applied equally to all members are the BAD guys I don't think you are fooling any one really.
You are fighting for stirring shit. Seems to be your specialty.
I am suggesting you are supporting bobs clearly trust abusing actions YES.
I just came to this thread to post my deleted thread.
LOL I love how you say I was only replying to some other person (who was not debating anything to do with the central points mentioned in initial post) then when we just say that is no excuse you say....oh well I don't accept your summary LOLOLOL
This point that you are making is clear as mud to the extent that it is relevant to any possible at-issue point.
What are you saying then If we were getting you all wrong.
You(s) (look I am being courteous by referrring to you(s) in the plural....
) seem to have a tendency to kind of lump matters together, whether subject or members, so there is that.There is no substance in your answers at all with regard refuting anything we have said.
I did not know that I needed to refute anything. I just posted a deleted thread, and you confirmed that you deleted it. So, the subject seems to be over. You admitted the whole point that I was making.. Thanks for your cooperation. You are such a nice guy(s).
you were offtopic and didn't bring any observable instances = get it now?? LOL
I get that you are like a broken record with unimportant points, so I have observed that instance of an observable, if that counts for anything.
So according to JJG
Presenting observable and undeniable instances of financially motivated wrong doing including, scamming, extortion, scammer supporting, willing scam facilitating for pay, trust abuse and double standards = stiring up shit and non-contributory content. AHAHAHAHAHAHAH He sounds IDEAL for DT. hahahaahah
#
Sorry wordy wordsmith .. your waffle will be sliced away to reveal the paper thin defense which we will enjoy igniting with our flame thrower or shredding with our chain saw.
You already seem less that those low functioning no hoping self debunking fools that came before you. There is no substance just a lot of flowery waffle.
You were making no point. You posted off topic irrelevant garbage to try and derail our thread. You then claim it was not off topic because although it tackled none of the central points in the OP some other half witted idiot scammer ( the same one you tried to protect by sneakily removing his quoted post in the wo thread) went off topic so you think it is permitted flow and someone on topic to continue with his off topic derailing LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL
You are making no points you are clearly unable to form a credible and valid rebuttal to our points. Are we clear now??
You need to stick to specifically debating the central points in the initial post, you also need to stick by our local rules there. Got it idiot.
I don't care if you two girls had some bitch fight over who is the receiver this week and who cooks dinner next week. You sissy squabbles are nothing to "us" you are trying to derail the thread that details whataboutbobs trust abuse and girly bitchy tactics. Got it moron.
Good now stfu or bring some meat to your arguments to we can really tuck in.
We do not bond with scammer supporting bitcoin beggars who seek to push clear double standards on this board. We crush them.