I doubt that you are really saving anyone or clarifying matters with your ongoing unsupported conclusions, ie that this is a witch hunt, and your other various convolutions and ad hominems etc.
That is all irrelevant. Any conclusions I make are independent of the fact that the conclusions against OGNasty
require assumption and speculation and are not conclusive proof of anything. I don't have to prove my conclusions. You have to prove your conclusions, that is how burden of proof works.
You seem to be twisting my part in this whole situation. I have not been presenting any evidence. I have largely been commenting on the process, which seems to go to your witch hunt allegations, which I suppose I agree with you regarding any suggestion that, for example with OGNasty's conduct, there would be an initial presumption of innocence.
But seems to me that Twitchy has presented evidence and logic to undermine those presumptions of innocence that could allow members to conclude that OGNasty might be guilty of the alleged conduct.
You are largely asserting to stop the investigation because it is a witch hunt. There could be some burden of production and persuasion upon you in that regard, also, but whatever, the evidence is still being presented here and members can decide for themselves whether the evidence is persuasive.