Quote from: HCP on December 14, 2019, 11:04:52 PM

Quote from: Blacknavy on December 14, 2019, 10:38:55 PM

Goraset copied someones article, it was a mistake but it doesnt mean he is a scammer. Trust me, he is more reliable than 99.99 percent of those members.

A mistake? so he tripped and accidentally posted someone else's article and tried to pass it off as his own? Huh

While plagiarism may not make him a "scammer" in the traditional sense of the word... it does make him dishonest and untrustworthy in the eyes of some.

People in local sections didnt know what is plagiarism but they learned by now.

He has already been tagged by some DT members but he has been still sending posts to this forum for 2 years even if he dont get paid to send post because he couldnt wear a signature since he was tagged. He isnt DT1 member but i think he deserves to become DT2. He known for his solidity, I can use him as an escrow.

However, people removed him from their DT lists but he doesnt deserve to be banned.

Quote from: marlboroza on December 14, 2019, 11:35:05 PM

Quote from: Blacknavy on December 14, 2019, 10:38:55 PM

Goraset copied someones article, it was a mistake but it doesnt mean he is a scammer. Trust me, he is more reliable than 99.99 percent of those members.

It was more than one article and he retaliated against person whose article he stole, lauda, me, he even lied that he didn't do it, I bet if that other person had accused him that he would have retaliated too. He doesn't look like reliable person to me, but "more reliable than 99.99% of those members" is probably something to discuss. It's like saying "he robbed a bank, he is better than the other guy who killed 10 people", while it might be true that bank robber is probably better than a killer that doesn't beat the fact that they both did "something wrong". Ban evasion is only a bonus.

Quote from: Blacknavy on December 14, 2019, 10:38:55 PM

If you gave a chance people to learn the new default system, people would do it.

How hard it can be? You see someone doing "shit" and you don't trust him nor his judgement.

Retailating against default trust members didnt mean anything in old default system because you were as god. People knew that when they send a negative trust to DT members, it couldnt decrease their reputation because default trust system was centralized and you were unbreakable (i couldnt find this word exactly but i think you can understand).