Ya'll are making me frustrated..
Begging for 100% solid proof that he was reimbursed won't magically make proof appear. We've got someone saying he did reimburse someone who has nothing to gain from making that up (which, btw, should not be confused with considering Pirate "trustworthy"), and someone who's either avoiding the question or has poor writing skills.
So, it's not "us" making you frustrated, it's the situation and what we have, so far. And that situation demands asking questions.
You don't see any issue with people being forced to prove their innocence on demand? You don't see how this would be abused? There is a very good reason the criminal justice system uses the standard of "innocent until proven guilty" because the process itself can easily become a tool of retribution. Are you absolutely sure he has nothing to gain? With the series of accusations against him made by Twitchy Seal it in fact does seem like he has something to gain, in the form of targeting OGNasty.
I think this didn't come out the way I meant it to. Maybe language barrier. I was referring to Pirate: he's got nothing to gain from lying to the court, especially with information which is easily verifyable.
Generally, I totally agree that "guilty until proven innocent" is not an option, hence I'm careful forming an opinion, here.
I don't know much about what else is going on between Twitchy and OgNasty. All I've seen is the information provided in this thread, and I absolutely think it's enough to ask questions.