Armstrong's logic is utter nonsense. First it is obvious that Wikipedia cannot be quoted in research because it is dynamic. How could you possibly quote something in research that is subject to change?

But people do not read Wikipedia because they want to quote it. They want to learn something quickly, get some ideas and links to further information and then, perhaps quote the information Wikipedia links to. So he is trying to discredit Wikipedia with something that Wikipedia is not even trying to be.

He hates Wikipedia simply because he cannot control it. He can control his own site because nobody is allowed to write a comment on it. And he can get the Forecaster Movie made for him where he controls the narrative. The Wikipedia article exposes the Forecaster movie for what it is simply by quoting free press articles.

Then he creates that conspiracy theory that the deep state is after him controlling Wikipedia. This is a joke.

Wikipedia is controlled by rules not by individuals. Nobody in the deep state cares about Martin Armstrong. The idea that someone with an agenda would infiltrate Wikipedia for the purpose of harming that Martin Armstrong moron is ridiculous.

Imagine the risk such an agent would take for a zero benefit. Doing this and being exposed would raise Armstrong's profile so much in the alt-conspiracy world that this would thoroughly defeat that hypothetical purpose.


Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for a reason.

Read this blog starting at page 273 to find out more about computerized fraud.


See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog.