Quote from: suchmoon on December 21, 2019, 04:24:20 PM

Quote from: TECSHARE on December 21, 2019, 03:17:23 PM

As you can see I was creating a summary of another user's posts

tl;dr: your opinion about another user's post is not a "summary". To put it another way, it's about as much of a summary as Lauda's feedback (which BTW I think is inappropriate but don't let that stop you from attacking me) is a summary of your behavior here on the forum.

You call it whatever you like. Your completely semantic distinction doesn't change the fact my quote was edited to make it appear as if it was a straight forward statement in my own voice when it was nothing of the sort.

Quote from: suchmoon on December 21, 2019, 05:24:41 PM

Quote from: Lauda on December 21, 2019, 04:33:39 PM

Quote from: suchmoon on December 21, 2019, 04:24:20 PM

which BTW I think is inappropriate

Care to elaborate? It has clean text, a proper reference and is based on actual events rather than opinions. Additionally, it seems to be even more in line of how the system should be used ever since the trust guidelines were lessened after the introduction of the flag-system.

I think it's red trust for opinion, however unpopular, distasteful, or malevolent it might me. I'd say the same about most trolls like TECSHARE, cryptohunter, etc, unless their trolling translates into actual scamming or some other tangible threat like doxing.

Quickseller is roughly where I'd draw the line of troll vs scammer. Quickseller is a scammer and a genuinely dangerous troll. TECSHARE is a pitiful egocentric troll.

That's just my opinion.

At least you have enough integrity in this instance to not let your personal opinions of me change your standards for what is and is not acceptable to negative rate people over. You are free to think I am a cunt, I won't even argue with you over that, just don't abuse the systems designed to prevent fraud to fight your petty interpersonal battles. That is where I draw the line.