Quote from: 3rac3 on February 24, 2014, 05:23:33 PM

I am not saying that you opinion doesn't matter. Quite the contrary. I simply don't like when someone calls me names.

Apart from sharing some details about California can you please explain how would you like to get yours and my btc back?

My bad, wasnt trying to call you names. I just get heated discussing this stuff because so many people are getting screwed while the only guy who can prevent it from happening isnt even around and refuses to help.

Here is a good start: https://oag.ca.gov/consumers

The summary of AB129 (bill in CA legalizing alternative currencies) currently reads like this:

Quote

Summary: Specifies that current law which bans the issuance or circulation of anything but lawful money of the United States does not prohibit the issuance and use of alternative currency.

If the senate passes the bill, we will be in a much better position to recoup our btc losses from this "investment". I'm not even sure if a *certain* individual is legally allowed to offer investments like this anyway, and for good reason (this situation right here).

(See: http://www.sec.gov/about/laws.shtml, although, waldo may fall under an exemption which he would have already had to file, see: http://www.arnoldporter.com/resources/documents/CalBusLawPract%20EKF%20JSK%20Formatted.pdf )

I can keep going, this is literally just the top of the shit-pile.