^
Pay your debts

Oh lol, I edited my post above, and already done

I see what you did now

Edit: Merited you, thanks micgoossens for +2, though next time maybe just merit the user's post yourself 
I'm clearly not great at understanding economics

Why? It benefits two posters right now

I already explained

I'm clearly not great at understanding economics

TA is voodoo, it NEVER works reliably. Economics of the process is what actually works.
BTW: in the hypothetical surrogate TA observation that temperature is lower in the winter than in the summer (in northern hemisphere) what is more important: the "TA" observation or the knowledge of orbital tilt and planet rotation around the star?
Ah fundamentals v TA. An argument as old as the hills. The challenge being that economics is not the dismal science, but rather no science at all. And there is no rational economic explanation for short term price perturbations.
Think of it this way. TA is the study of the psychology of price discovery. TA is asking the question - what will the crowd do when X happens? And how can you make the crowd do Y?
True story. That psychology of price discovery, unrelated to economics, is also the psychology of "human rationality" or more specifically "the herd".
Humans are far from rational, instead they act like most animals in a herd like mentality: they lack basic intelligence when panicked or feeling threatened.
I doubt that it is fair to assert that people are acting in a herd mentality merely because TA attempts to both describe and to predict their behavior in terms of what the masses of people are doing or likely to do.
There is still individual deviation within the pattern that is attempted to be captured by TA, even if the TA has some predictive value and sometimes even very accurate predictive value for the masses, but not necessarily for the individual and does not necessarily take away the free will from the individual, even if the TA might suggest that the individual is engaging in dumbass behavior (or at least NOT as prosperous of a route) if s/he attempts to deviate from what the TA suggests.. which might also pay off from time to time, too.
There are also forces, including individual action(s) that will try with a lot of might to can fuck up the TA, and sometimes will be successful, and surely any TA that is worth any kind of salt will attempt to predict and prepare for deviations and destruction attempts, too. Successfully? Perhaps sometimes. Surely some models are better than others and sometimes some models have to be thrown in the rubbish and some models merely can be tweaked in order to make better at both description and prediction.