Quote from: ChuckBuck on December 29, 2019, 04:23:31 AM

I have read this topic since the beginning and what we discuss is about Yobit's Investbox. Most of us agree that Investbox should not be advertised, and neither do I. I brought the old signature of Cryptotalk until a new signature was updated (current signature) and look what we have:

This guy leaves negative trust for anyone who is active in Yobit's campaign, no matter it's not the Investbox, even yahoo66278 is the same. I know that everyone is free to express their opinions, he does too, but giving a series of negative trust with anyone in Yobit campaign. Even just Cryptotalk and Airdrop. Is it an extreme action?

I think suchmoon left neutral feedback for many displaying the Yobit signature and others left red feeback. Each has their own view.

In the end if a user feels that promoting a scam automatically equates to red Trust because the promoter is a scammer too - then that view is accurate to a degree.

If a user feels that promoting a scam equates to neutral Trust because giving the benefit of the doubt maybe the promoter did not investigate for possible scam links before promoting - then that view is accurate to a degree too.

Other than leaving red trust for Yobit and just one Yobit signature promoter (because of his condescending conduct and deliberate misdirection not failure to justify why he was a die-hard Yobit promoter), I did not leave feedback for Yobit signature promoter.

In my view anybody promoting a scam are guilty of being a scam too simply by association but more important than that is the view I hold they are most probably more ignorant than anything else therefore I do not leave red trust for that reason alone. Had signature promoters investigated the facts fully then most would probably not participate in those scam campaigns.