... It should also be noted that Mr Armstrong did not graduate in Economics from University & thus is not technically an Economist so surely the team at AE would be even more keen to prove their abilities at predicting the future by going over the number of correct/incorrect calls from the previous WEC?
This is my sticking point with Armstrong & the answer is clearly one of two things: a) They have the worst PR department in the history of any business or b) He is a indeed a fake.....
If this is taken as a Binary question then the answer must be
b). Here is the proof:
Martin Armstrong has not perfected the ability to improve the quality of his products and services.
He has perfected his processes of fraudulently misrepresenting the quality and performance of his products and services in hindsight by manufacturing fake user feedback, and by altering the results of an ambiguous system in hindsight up to the point where they change its rules.
This can be be seen in action
in this piece of incontrovertible evidence where a clear failure becomes a success.
Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for that reason but he has not changed.
Read this blog
starting at page 273 to find out more about computerized fraud.
See
armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog