Ninjastic
PostEdited versionsQuotes to this post
Post
Topic
Board Reputation
Re: Ree @hacker1001101001 ICO bump?
by
Lauda
on 02/01/2020, 16:20:31 UTC
Quote from: marlboroza on January 02, 2020, 04:13:14 PM
Quote from: Lauda on January 02, 2020, 03:33:55 PM
You misunderstood me.
I get your point, I am just making it clear for everyone who will read post, when you say to someone "you sound like.." sometimes some people use it as "you said he/she/it is..", that's all Tongue
That's why I elaborated too(!), especially why I added the following:

Quote from: Lauda on January 02, 2020, 03:33:55 PM
Obviously I have no evidence to support this connection.
We sometimes do sound and behave like purrrfect alts. Shocked


Quote from: marlboroza on January 02, 2020, 04:13:14 PM
Quote from: Quickseller on January 01, 2020, 04:27:15 PM
I had suspected that hacker1001.. was a bought account. IIRC, he kinda came out of nowhere and lent money to marcotheminer.
There is one 7 days old transaction https://etherscan.io/tx/0xa80610a055815e42347614654d4d701770fb306ceec49402e2b4aacdcde56f35
Hacker said he is original owner of account so I guess signing message from that ethereum address will clear all doubts (about account owner).
Right, I will clarify for those that may not be following or are having a difficult time to do so. There are only two possible cases at this point in time:

  • He/she/it purchased or "hacked" the account: He/she/it claimed previously that they did not - This is true if they fail to sign/confirm ownership of the address. This may still be true if they manage to prove address ownership.
  • He/she/it is involved or even is behind actual ICO bumping services - This is true if they manage to sign/confirm ownership of the address.
The only third possible case is one where both points are true. I'll wait for a clarification.