Quote from: over45 on January 02, 2020, 10:46:58 PM

We are not claiming here that forecasts must be perfect. This is effectively what you are saying, right?

No. Wrong again.

In fact, we are accusing him of fraud.

No you're not. You are trying to defend a position. If you were accusing him of fraud you would actually do that - accuse him personally and professionally of fraud and take legal action. Do it formally. Confront him with a legal filing or public article in the newspaper. Why not do that? Because you know he'd eat you alive. You are not credible.

Take him to court. Here is how the proceedings would go:

Judge: You are accusing M.A. of fraud.
You: Yes your honor
Judge: Did your read the terms and conditions on the site?
You: Yes your honor
Judge: Case dismissed. Pay M.A.'s atty fees for filing a frivolous lawsuit.

You are making assumptions again. Since when do some terms and conditions on some web site apply to the universe?

If you were correct, then all I would need to commit the perfect crime are some terms and conditions on a web site, and any case against me would be dismissed as you just suggested.

Because I have terms and conditions which give me the Get Out of Jail Free card?

Not worth even discussing.

In case you have missed it, what counts here is that people who are looking for information are getting the tools to evaluate Martin Armstrong's products and services.

And many have expressed their gratitude for the information available here.

I don't really care much about you if you have a different agenda such as defending Martin Armstrong.

Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for that reason but he has not changed.

Read this blog starting at page 273 to find out more about computerized fraud.

See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog