Post
Topic
Board Meta
Re: bitcointalk.org is DEATH
by
JollyGood
on 03/01/2020, 22:06:35 UTC
If he had responded to your post with factual evidence justifying how and why those merits and trusts were received and given, we all would have seen the post. We all could have made an opinion about it but the evidence you have captured speaks volumes about what the OP is actually doing and how can any member simply accept it without pointing it out to him?
I was looking forward to read his reasoning why he included those people indeed. I got off-topic posts instead:
I've deleted wolwoo's off-topic posts. This topic isn't meant to just post a Trust list. Wolwoo is welcome to post again if he can add his reasons for the exclusions:
Share yours
I encourage everyone to keep track of the reasons behind their own exclusions too.
I don't think it's helpful to create many topics on this, feel free to use 1 post here for yours (including reasons), and I'll link it from the next post.
I can't wait to see "retaliation" as a reason instead of valid thoughtful reasons that are worthy of being on DT.
As a bonus, he did prove me right that he bases his Trust on retaliation.

Yes the OP did prove you right with regards to retaliation but he has nothing else to offer other than being aggressive, foul-mouthed, argumentative and condescending.

He should have at least taken the opportunity to try to clearly and calmly debate the case against him by providing facts and evidence to counter the evidence you presented so the debate could take place in a healthy environment. Instead he used an online-translator to post the following very colourful language:

Let's get to the topic,
Mr Loycev
Why do you support the bastards who put me and the signatories like me under suspicion?
open the title and ban all yobit signers. doesn't your ass eat?


Or is it easier for me to deal with because I'm the only one?

Can't you and your dog-henchmen scare me?