Quote from: JollyGood on January 03, 2020, 10:06:35 PM

Quote from: LoyceV on January 03, 2020, 08:51:30 PM

Quote from: JollyGood on January 03, 2020, 08:41:31 PM

If he had responded to your post with factual evidence justifying how and why those merits and trusts were received and given, we all would have seen the post. We all could have made an opinion about it but the evidence you have captured speaks volumes about what the OP is actually doing and how can any member simply accept it without pointing it out to him?

I was looking forward to read his reasoning why he included those people indeed. I got off-topic posts instead:

Quote from: LoyceV on December 24, 2019, 07:11:14 PM

I've deleted wolwoo's off-topic posts. This topic isn't meant to just post a Trust list. Wolwoo is welcome to post again if he can add his reasons for the exclusions:

Quote from: LoyceV on January 17, 2019, 11:15:02 AM

Share yours
I encourage everyone to keep track of the reasons behind their own exclusions too.
I don't think it's helpful to create many topics on this, feel free to use 1 post here for yours (including reasons), and I'll link it from the next post.

I can't wait to see "retaliation" as a reason instead of valid thoughtful reasons that are worthy of being on DT.

As a bonus, he did prove me right that he bases his Trust on retaliation.

Yes the OP did prove you right with regards to retaliation but he has nothing else to offer other than being aggressive, foul-mouthed, argumentative and condescending.

He should have at least taken the opportunity to try to clearly and calmly debate the case against him by providing facts and evidence to counter the evidence you presented so the debate could take place in a healthy environment. Instead he used an online-translator to post the following very colourful language:

Quote from: wolwoo on January 03, 2020, 09:15:55 AM

Let's get to the topic,
Mr Loycev
Why do you support the bastards who put me and the signatories like me under suspicion?
open the title and ban all yobit signers. doesn't your ass eat?

Or is it easier for me to deal with because I'm the only one?

Can't you and your dog-henchmen scare me?

Are you PUSHING DOUBLE STANDARDS YES OR NO??

The initial poster is clearly CORRECT to respond to you and CORRECTLY state you are untrustworthy if YOU ARE. This is his DUTY not to be written off as retaliation LOL ... relying on robovac to dream you up an excuse is a SURE RECIPE FOR failure , that dunce is only good for copy and paste raw data spew right?? and eating scammer ass.

Hey policeman says alice, bob stole my phone again. Hmmmm says the DT policeman aka agent foxpoop, are you just reporting and making this known out of RETALIATION that is not allowed by the way.. LOLOLOLOLOLOL
Don't forget alice if you told him you were coming here to report him we will also need to slap you with blackmail and extortion again hahahahaahahah

Here prove you are not pushing double standards.

Red tag now these members THEY ARE WEARING YOBIT SIGS . Failure to red tag them demonstrates you are untrustworthy for pushing double standards It is impossible to deny. I will bring more after you red tag these members to prove you are not pushing double standards

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=355846

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=623643

these are just 2 I found in a few seconds I will be adding more.

FAILURE to red tag them means you are corrupt and pushing double standards there can be no denial of this.

LAUDA and moronbozo often work together and are confirmed croatian trust abusers who likely are from the same deeply polluted gene pool.

Let me know when it is done. The initial poster has EVERY RIGHT to be pissed off and engage you in any way he feels he wants to if you refuse.

What is the point of being a " scam hunter" if you give free passes to your pals?? this makes you look even worse than doing nothing.

You will become like mosprognoz who suchmoon correctly notes CALLS OUT SCAMS then wants to work with them to make " lots of money " LOL

Scam hunting the perfect cover for scammers and double standards pushers.

I have no immediate beef with you but you can not be permitted to go around slamming double standards on people. Sort it out stop jumping on the low functioning spew excuses robovac sharts out for you that will always collapse under the slightest scrutiny.

LET ME KNOW WHEN YOU HAVE RED TAGGED THESE MEMBERS AND I WILL BRING YOU SOME OTHERS.

Hiding behind he is angry at clear double standards being pushed on him, and he does not speak perfect english is pathetic.

When are you flagging mosprognoz and lauda for wanting to work with projects you CLAIM are 100% scams??

Scam hunters with double standards are MORE high risk that people that don't hunt scams at all obviously.

This is not me attacking you full on this is me telling you that you need to ensure you don't push double standards and create a 2 tier system. You still have time to fix your shit before you go on the KNOWING AND WILLFUL SCAMMERS and scammer supporters list. Either punish or do not punish but making it fucking consistent or you are a scammer yourself that is NOT something you can deny. You can not pretend a certain behavior deserves RED TRUST for one person and NOT another.

Why are you not flagging mosprognoz for his actions here?? this involves behavior with a SCAM you are 100 % sure about?? Don't make me look for it ask suchmoon she was all over it and presented more damning evidence of this.

This is a thread specifically about your actions so you need to start making sure you have a very clean and CONSISTENT sheet or else that needs to be constantly talked about.

The initial poster has EVERY RIGHT to be aggressive and pissed off if you are SINGLING him out for punishment you refuse to give to others.