Quote from: eddie13 on January 06, 2020, 02:58:09 PM

Quote from: mosprognoz on January 06, 2020, 02:07:55 PM

DEEPONION PAIDSHILL

Good to see you back.. How are you?

I have looked into dragons and the onion situation a bit, not finished, but I'm still trying to figure out why he deserves negative trust for being interested in that project..

mosprognoz 2019-10-21 Reference Made serious accusations about a project without a single reference (msg52799029). The user was given a total of 72 hours to provide sources as evidence but was not capable of doing so, despite repeated requests (refs: msg52808483, msg52810914, msg52816768), as well as contradictory evidence. Clearly believes they can make unfounded accusations and use deflection tactics to avoid accountability.
mosprognoz 2019-10-21 Reference (Continued) Neutral feedback left as this user is not at risk of trading with, but likely to make allegations without references that would be damaging to current or future scam accusations. Doesn't appear to understand that you can't make false accusations, even if a project is scam, or accused of such.
mosprognoz 2019-11-10 Reference Continues to be unreliable and inconsistent with feedback. This user has now twice given and retracted similar feedback against me within 1 month. As a reminder, this user is not at high-risk of trading with, but it's therefore recommended to wait 30 days to see if trust left by this user is kept or removed.
mosprognoz 2019-11-10 Reference Gave retaliatory negative feedback for the third time now (after removed twice before), proving exactly the point made in my previous feedback: continues to be unreliable and inconsistent with feedback.
Sources | Refrences | Archives: [1], [2]

Quote from: mosprognoz on November 10, 2019, 02:05:06 PM

I removed my tag, because some of his post are useful

[Archived]