-snip-
You clearly didn't read my previous post (see here:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5215128.msg53533796#msg53533796), and my position is absolutely not what you are insinuating.
Being able to sign a message is not proof on its own, but is the first step in being able to establish something approaching proof. CSW has failed repeatedly and hilariously to do this, even going so far as trying to fake signatures. All his other "evidence" is obviously false and easily debunked.
Sure, real evidence of someone being Satoshi will be difficult to establish, but it is absolutely, categorically, none of the "evidence" CSW has presented.
Not knowing it better, but knowing what ppl try loudly to get sth from Satoshi - in addition to what he delivered with Bitcoin - not wanting to do any kind of OWN Research = PoW
I can understand that Satoshi would not do the easy peasy proof - not that he owes that by any means