Quote from: The Pharmacist on January 08, 2020, 02:51:46 PM

And ys, we've all made mistakes before, some more serious than others, but that doesn't mean any of us can't call BS when we see it. By that logic, anyone is free to do anything with no consequences whatsoever. The world just doesn't function that way.

NO that is not how it works. You want punishment for WRONG DOING. Then ALL wrong doing must be evaluated and the correct and consistent punishment must be given.

Else that means you are pushing for a 2 tier system that will always be WRONG.

A rapist, murdering, armed robber, peado , does not get to claim that guy stealing 1 cent candies MUST BE PUNISHED without themselves being punished in a fair and sensible way. Even worse that rapist mudering armed robber peado does not get to give the punishment out as judge and jury whilst loving the fact they are paid to push this double standards crap. That is extreme example but just so we are clear one is accepted generally as worse than the other.

I think though in this case if there are multiple counts of different "guides" being presented that are clear copy and paste with zero references WITH financial intent then yes a sig ban and merits stripped off. BUT after we punish the proven scammers here and they get it first.

They scammers, can point OUT wrong doing, but should not be screaming for what they think is the correct punishment whilst not being willing to discuss their own punishment.

Would be good to see the ORIGINAL guides and his guides so we can see how it really is.

Lauda giving out red to anyone is a joke. Same for his cronies/supporters.

These people should really have NO POWER to abuse. There needs to be a drill down on this "plagiarism" and sensible punishment depending on the intentions and consistency over time. Let's sort it out right after those with scamming post histories start commenting on their own suitable punishments.

Were not all these HE MUST BE BANNED AND RED TAGGED pals with chibitchity or whatever and begging for him to be reinstated to this forum AFTER he admitted he did it for financial gain??? have they slapped him with red and flags yet?? DOUBLE STANDARDS>
YES OR NO??

The intent should be key here but both can get a sig ban, won't hurt to remind them. Sigs are the problem here anyway.