Quote from: Bitcoin Forum

A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by a Bitcoin Forum moderator. Posts are most frequently deleted because they are off-topic, though they can also be deleted for other reasons. In the future, please avoid posting things that need to be deleted.

Quote

Quote from: Lauda on January 08, 2020, 05:25:25 PM

Quote from: The Pharmacist on January 08, 2020, 05:22:36 PM

Let me correct the "unwarranted" statement. The feedback itself is appropriate. It just isn't necessary. That's what I should have written. I am in no way criticizing you for negging this guy, because I wouldn't trust him either.

Yes please. It's quite a nuisance to be attacked for something that isn't necessary but is appropriate masked under the reasoning that it isn't appropriate. This is a general statement based off of sentiment over the last couple of months, not particularly saying that you've been attacking people! Content theft is by every definition stealing, therefore a trust-related action. How do we handle plagiarism? Forum staff bans the users. Should we vilify people who leave negative ratings for plagiarism, i.e. scamming? No.

Fork your own words if want fork. Stealing is a no go.

The "plagiarism" of posting some other persons work for helpful reasons is fucking requiring a BAN is bogus as fuck here WHEN you take it in the full context of the SCAMMING, EXTORTING, TRUSTABUSE and shady escrow and supporting other AUCTION SCAMMERS

Let's START WITH THE MOST SERIOUS SCAMMING, EXTORTING AND TRUST ABUSING scum like you first lauda, after we ban you, tman, nutildah, then we can start thinking up a more suitable punishments for those posting GUIDES to help others without giving FULL CREDIT to those that made the guide originally. Sure some punishment but lets start getting sensible here in the full context of the danger posed to members of this forum.
Like take their sigs away for a year.

SO yes let's delete his sigs for a year or 2 AFTER we have banned the scammers and extortionists and auction scammers like you.

Turns my stomach to see a fucking dirt bag like you and your scummy scammer supporter pals screaming these types of "plagiarists " must be banned IMMEDIATELY LOL

How did you get all cocky and start posting back on meta as if you have a snow white history here you croatian dog??

Myself or my good friends will NEVER stop reminding you that you don't get to call for bans and punishments for LESSER crimes than you have committed here many times.

Sure punish them, 2 year sig ban for helpful non financially motivated guides etc, BUT ONLY if we are punishing consistent scammers and extortionists and trust abusers with BANS FIRST.

The peado, rapist, murdering, armed robber, crying DEATH PENALTY for the guy that shop lifted the 1cent candy LOL --- whilst the sicko thief murderer becomes a judge and jury all rolled into one and paid nicely ahahahahahah no thanks.

Negative trust is perhaps fine, but NOT protocol here is it??, although I see NO DIRECT financial risk of other members COMPARED to the scamming , extorting, auction scamming, trust abusing etc.

No more double standards in meta. You will be called on it EVERY TIME. No scammers get to cry for others punishments for LESSER deeds. Fuck off. If not by ourselves we have infinite friends that will ALWAYS be there to tell the truth.

These people do not give one fuck about plagiarism at all. They post memes or even pics with WORDING (guides, definitions, who passages of text etc) that would be classed as plagiarism if it were not in PICTURE form not text LOL ...like that makes any fucking difference.

THEN they BEG for their own PALS chibitchity or whatever his name is to be reinstated after admitting he did plagiarize for financial reasons LOLLOLOLOL
Double standards.

The plagiarism aspect is clearly noted in the " abuse" of trust
Lauda speculates on the validity of it and implications of it.

We answer and BOOM off topic and irrelevant HOW SO??

Mods MORE than welcome to explain for clarity.

The abuse is based on plagiarism, which is a mod issue not red trust anyway right??? suggesting bans etc is just the icing on the cake from scammers?? is it off topic to say that SCAMMERS that pose a clear and direct danger to honest members should be taken care of 1st?? this is not permitted flow?? how so??

OUR post debates the legitimacy of the plagiarism claim, the motivation , the full context of punishment for dangers posed to honest members here??? and the right of scammers to call for bans for posting guides without full credits to the original creator??

Let's get to the bottom of this mystery???

WHO reported and WHO deleted??? enough is enough , lets debate and CLARIFY the permitted flow here on this forum. ANOTHER gamed and weaponized metric (deleted posts).

Come on mods STOP hiding up sniping away with deletes. Let's hear your clear and detailed explanation. I don't give 1 fuck if this account gets banned on SPURIOUS grounds. It only serves as an example of how fucked this forum is. My friends are numerous and horny to take up this torch. You will NEVER silence the truth and the message that double standards here are NOT going to be tolerated.

Permitted flow is so subjective, and the last weapon they have when all others are crushed.

Either the guy is being abused or not , who is abusing him and why is it abuse?? are double standards abuse or not? I realize these are complex concepts for most here. Plagiarism ?? copying guides to help other with no direct financial gain vs undeniable scamming?? hhmmmmm which to tackle first??

The moderation here and the leverage of the broken gamed metrics it produces are clear and dangerous. Permitted flow needs to be thrashed out and made transparent. Else it is a scam like most things here now.