I've done alot of empirical testing on it against real market data
you may have done your testing on inaccurate array data. You can forget about the arrays from Feb. 2019 - August 2019 on ask-socrates.com. I'm sure they were completely faulty during that time.
This is part of the problem. Even if the Socrates system did work, the roll out was quite unprofessional because the subscribers were basically the guinea pigs.
Well, there was this banner on ask-socrates.com that they are still migrating the data and there may be issues. So there was and still is a warning on the system. I think MA just wanted to get the system released and grant access to the reversals. I don't want to discuss that things went wrong with the release of SOC Pro. This I've mentioned already numerous times. I just wanted to say that the arrays didn't make any sense before, but they do now. So your tests have been done based on inaccurate data (which was of course not your fault). I'm also not talking about whether the arrays are good or not. That is a different question.
Ok so if he sold us Smurf’s inaccurate information then
a. Where’s my credit or refund
b. Why hasn’t he contacted people like myself who cancelled subscriptions and offered a credit or allowed access to his updated and supposedly now working arrays reversals etc.
For the record I was a Pro subscriber
His best call remains DO NOT GO LONG THIS MARKET
As we say in Australia MAs FULL OF SHIT
WOULD LOVE TO PUNCH HIM IN THE FACE
Same thing happened to me. When I noticed, I asked for a refund. These assholes refused - that is one of the many reasons why why I am here now.
There are obviously still enough idiots born every day, so what
Gumbi wrote to me makes total sense:
There is no such thing as bad publicity. The irony is I found out about Armstrong from people like you.
HAHA my first victim

So where are the victims? Just look here:
Reality of a Global CurrencyNow, in case that anybody thinks that Socrates works now or is any better because they have fixed something - no way. They basically replaced one random solution with another random solution. IT CAN'T BE FIXED.
Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for that reason but he has not changed.
Read this blog
starting at page 273 to find out more about computerized fraud.
See
armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog.