Quote from: Spendulus on January 10, 2020, 04:09:53 AM

Quote from: KingScorpio on January 10, 2020, 03:52:22 AM

Quote from: Spendulus on January 10, 2020, 02:05:21 AM

Quote from: KingScorpio on December 20, 2019, 09:41:51 PM

Quote from: Spendulus on December 20, 2019, 09:33:33 PM

Sorry, you really can't apply human or even mammalian concepts of sexuality to insects.

nature involves everything in nature,

there are also mamals than run states, naked mole rats create feminist states https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naked_mole-rat

and if you look back into pre christian history, you will find even more, gay romans, indians, chinese, africans, and also matriachic ruled india.

human body cells also create a state the cells are gender neutral.

regards

Just a clarification. You can defend sexual behaviors all you want, and there are many valid defenses. But justification by comparison with insects is just plain ridiculous. This is also true for a comparison with different mammalian species.

the universe is a big place, there could be huge insectoid species, that live like insects,

besides there are feminists and feminist kinder gardens, there are also people that research artificial womb,

that are signs for a societial organisation similar like the one of a insect state,

not to mention muslim harems, where in a city more than 50% of the women where basically property of a single man.

you call yourself smart using a computer, then at least be smart, and open.

the universe is big, complex and diverse, if you don't like it become a farmer again.

regards

Yes, but wasn't your position (paraphrasing...) homosexuality is okay because (A) (B) (C) reasons...

An ethical or moral justification can't be made by comparison with insects. Sexuality in mammals varies widely. Some have been studied a lot, some species hardly at all.

As an example of a valid justification, suppose a king in the Middle Ages wanted to maximize male baby production so he could have the biggest armies. He might well set social incentives for baby production both through marriage and out of marriage sex, and set negative social incentives for gay behavior.

That's totally rational - in that context.

i dont mind homosexuality if its not toxic for a society homosexual behavior can be balancing and beneficial for a society,

bee swarms wouldn't work as they work harmonically if they wouldn't be homosexual/gender neutral.

issues are about sustainability etc.