Quote from: SockyMcSockFace on January 12, 2020, 12:54:05 AM

Quote from: The-One-Above-All on January 11, 2020, 01:07:17 PM

1. Your post is off topic because it does NOT make a comment on ANYTHING to do the blackmail/extortion AT ALL.

I didn't claim it was on topic.

Quote

2. Your post is another example of a cowardly sleaze bag who cuts away the full quote to misrepresent it. The full quote say you can scream and shout about people but you must bring evidence to corroborate it is true and that is a tiny fraction of that post you dumb cowardly cunt. The rest is ENTIRELY and undeniably on topic. You can not say the post is off topic because 1% of the post is NOT entirely concerning the initial post BUT is in answer to something someone has commented on and is relevant to the initial post.

No. That just simply isn't true. I left out the irrelevant bits. Also, I didn't claim that your post was off topic. Maybe try reading more and smashing your keyboard less. I said it was against your own local rule. Which clearly said 'no personal insults'. You then proceeded to do exactly that. Scream personal insults, without corroborating evidence. Unless you have some evidence stashed away to prove that nutildah lives in a "turd world dump" and has "failed with women and financial success in the 1st world."? Huh

In which case, you should have posted it to corroborate your personal insults. Without the evidence, it is against your own local rule. Like I said.

Quote

3.You don't get to make up the permitted flow as it suits you and using snippets of quotes to misrepresent what was said you conniving coward.

I'm not. I was pointing out that in your own thread, with your own rules, that you can't follow them. Also, you are over doing the whole "permitted flow" thing, like you did previously with "observable instances". Might want to mix it up a bit. Expand your vocabulary. Have some fun with it.

Quote

WHAT IS YOUR OPINION OF THIS EXTORTION AND BLACKMAIL Huh

your silence on that aspect of the thread is deafening.

He tried to blackmail eddie13 in public and rightly got removed from DT after demonstrating such poor judgement. So, what exactly is the issue now? Huh

Also, is it actually blackmail if it is done in public? or is it just threatening behaviour because you have already revealed the "bad stuff" to the public so there isn't that threat to reveal anymore? Huh

Genuine question.

Ahhhh nothing like giving out an early Monday morning head stomping to a cowardly piece of shit scammer supporter. Let's get started with your skull

1. Fun to see you have not tried and FAILED again to rebut the points we just carved in to you, and don't deny your post is off topic (so we need not really answer it but should just report it and have it removed, but since the scammy mods would more likely merit it and we prefer to leave it there as an example of your stupidity , then we shall).

2. Well done for acknowledging it is certainly an indefensible position mozprognoz has placed himself in. Although, I can't HELP BUT notice you do attempt to cast some doubt his wrong doing by stating " is it blackmail if he has already presented the most dangerous information" which of course does not mitigate the part where he says , he and his "team" lol will investigate it further and the "ripped off investors" and the " police" will be very interested unless eddie stops presenting observable instances of his shady shit. It is quite a robust example.

3. The points about nutildah are now (thanks to my very good self) widely known and people are begging us not to keep presenting them even WHERE THEY ARE ONTOPIC AND RELEVANT I don't expect any in meta are unfamiliar with his plight. Unless you class someone who was gifted a NEM stake (a possible 300BTC) , and early dash adopter who now begs for 0.02BTC loans an example of success?? go read his own " i am leaving the US for living in a mud hut in Phili to try to exist on my talented writing skills with my filli skank . Not that any of that should be conflated with evidence one can not stay on topic if they want to. So your specious argument is again laughable. Every off topic post must be evaluated on that specific example. You can not even say if one goes off topic in one thread they are AUTOMATICALLY off topic in another.

VERY STRANGE Yogg and Lauda have neglected to add red trust for this blackmail/extortion isn't it?? never mind it is better they do not. Double standards are always fun to point out. Yogg is pure dirt, I mean most accept lauda is already but YOGG is dirty, and likely and lauda alt or close scammer supporting pal.

Suggesting that one should adopted " new" or "variant" terms for things that describe that which they wish to express perfectly, and that they need to improve their vocabulary is of no interest to us. Those touting their expansive vocabularies and slick english who get pulled apart in debate by those that tend to just express themselves in simple terms is even more hilarious. Nerds who sit there for years memorizing a ton of other peoples achievements, work and discoveries complete with references, terminologies and theories. Then just spanked and thrashed in public by others that put in less than 1% of their effort and just rely on their natural powers of reason and creativity. Get your nose back in your books and keep expanding your vocabulary so you can rest on your laurels of being "literate" as we kick them from under you and bitch slap you around in public with some basic robust reasoning.

Permitted flow and observable instance(s). 2 of my favs. Here to stay.

It is clearly blackmail/extortion and it is clearly double standards from YOGG and LAUDA to refuse to red trust it. This is ANOTHER great thread to link to the dirty turds reveal.

Now coward stop posting and getting merits from your scammers supporting pals and alts it is disgraceful. Your account is stalking us pretty much and just demonstrates you are terrified of a member that has no dt red trust wand to damage you nor no merits to starve you from. Why so scared?? obviously you are terrified of us crushing your real account so badly in debate you lose all credibility or respect from your scamming pals. Not that that would be a bad thing really.

I will not be answering more off topic garbage unless i feel like it.

Stick to just reading the mozprognoz post and giving your opinions on whether is is 1, 2, or 3 and WHY.

To us it can only clearly be blackmail or extortion. Yogg says the same since he only needs a demand (stop all of this looking into me ) or I will ( investigate you are jim and tell burned investors and the police)

Yogg has said ANY " you must do x" or else i will do Y = blackmail/extortion.

Even alice who is sitting on the bus when bob runs up and grabs the phone out of her hands and starts walking away. If alice says to bob " give me back my phone or I will report this to the police" Yogg says she is an extortionist and blackmailer and that BOB is the damaged party here. How can you have yogg of bitcointalk here on default trust the scammer supporting filthy little shit? having people like mosprognoz, lauda, yogg, tman, nutildah reflect on the rest of you DT1. You all look dirty or weak.

Yogg ran away from this debate. Fucking coward and double standards piece of shit.