Quote from: polmax on February 25, 2014, 02:18:16 PM

Quote from: tertius993 on February 25, 2014, 01:50:30 PM

Quote from: wzttide on February 25, 2014, 01:46:28 PM

Quote from: polmax on February 25, 2014, 01:34:50 PM

I think it's a great option , it would give the coin even more elusive and would raise rates, but you can still leave and zero blocks

and now we have almost 16,000 coins , about 20 + days due to problems with a split chain has lost about 10%, I lost 41 CGA on cga.cryptochomper.com

just my opinion - exclusivity , elitism is not conducive to the description of the coins in the main post, which refers to the fact that we had a problem and we decided to change this and that. those who from the first days in the community knows and appreciates it , you did had very many important changes and do not let the problem kill the coin, but the new people, it may scare away or they think that was pre- mining . It's more marketing, but it is important

Someone said that this would "destroy" the coin's meaning, because with this every coin would be an anomaly.

That is my view, I am afraid. It would make it more like 42.

"destroy" the coin - why?
I talked about Block Reward / diff + algorithm with zero blocks
we are almost unlimited in issue (not 42) and the more network and diff - Reward those tend to zero

I think we have to seriously consider making the zero blocks worth mining and keeping elusiveness, from what I understand is you will otherwise always have people not mining the zero blocks or does jane-scrypt stop this?
It might make it more like 42? What does 42 do is that an elusive coin as well? could someone explain to me?
But as far as I can see this is a really good solution.