Quote from: marlboroza on January 18, 2020, 01:20:14 AM

I already posted it was a joke, what can I possibly send him, "I am sorry that one part of my post was supposed to be some kind of humor?

Although I get that pugman is just trying to be pragmatic and turn down the drama, I find the modern apology culture to be quite odious. Wresting an insincere apology from someone who did nothing wrong, and accepting an insincere apology from a manipulative criminal who is just trying to steal back trust, are two sides of the same apology shitcoin.

So if you want to bury the hatchet as deeply as you can, why dont you send Timelord a polite PM saying, Dear Sir: Im sorry you feel like my innocently-intended bawdy joke was somehow disrespectful toward you. Please forgive me. P.S., you are the master of scare-quotes; I learn at your feet. From all you have said in this thread, it seems that would be sincere. We could then wait with bated breath for his apology for making accusations against you on the basis of no evidence.

Am I not a master of apologetic diplomacy? So sorry!

dragonvslinux, so sorry, I was deliberately trying to not publicly criticize youmuch less to start some off-topic flamage in a thread about Timelord2067. I dont want to derail the thread here; but if you are accusing me of bad PGP practice, well, I have a reputation to maintain!

Quote from: dragonvslinux on January 18, 2020, 12:37:55 AM

You're talking about me right? Kind of obvious when I investigated your pgp signature

Why the mere fact that you posted about it make this so obvious? johhnyUA was the first to publicly call for a signed statement from me, with the appropriate remark that His pgp keys is well known and a handy link. Husna QA has had my public key for a long time; he is the author of the Indonesian forum PGP tutorial, where I am listed in the credits that I unfortunately cant read. Both of them replied to my signed statement in the PGP key thread before you did, plus someone else who apparently used Keybase (please, dont).

Quote from: dragonvslinux on January 18, 2020, 12:37:55 AM

(that hadn't previously been staked) Roll Eyes

Key management on this forum is a train wreck; and I would not expect for you to find it buried in that disorganized thread. However, it is thereironically, first brought there by Timelord2067. See below.

Quote from: dragonvslinux on January 18, 2020, 12:37:55 AM

You're wrong though, I wasn't trying to help you (sorry). I saw a verification error. Namely, you signing a message without previously staked key and was curious so investigated...

Nope. Its thereat least the important part, the full fingerprint, ~~plus a binding signed statement demonstrating possession of the corresponding private key~~. [Edit: Oops, I mixed up what I had posted in which thread.] (The latter is actually unnecessary for me, since I bound my Bitcoin Forum userid into a PGP key userid.) That was the only stuff sensible to stake at a time before the public keyserver network crashed and burned.

From the thread where you say I didnt stake anything, n.b. Timelords archive of my profile page (here changed from http to https in the quote):

Quote from: nullius on February 12, 2018, 09:10:04 PM

Quote from: Timelord2067 on January 02, 2018, 02:22:50 PM

I've just noticed Junior Member nullius' signature in a post in a vanitygen thread I post in occasionally: [...]

The PGP 0xC2 is also on his profile page https://archive.is/lqi7R#selection-471.0-471.47

Thanks for noticing that. My PGP key fingerprints are:

Ed25519, preferred: 0xC2E91CD74A4C57A105F6C21B5A00591B2F307E0C
[...]

Also, I had previously staked my PGP key fingerprint with a binding signed message in another stake thread. Also, my PGP key fingerprint has been in the signature of every forum post that I have ever made since December 2017, as may be verified in the Internet Archive and other sources. And in my signature in archived messages to bitcoin-dev, tor-dev, and elsewhere. And... I have been at pains to spread my PGP identity root-of-trust fingerprint so far and wide that it should be infeasible even for powerful attackers to fake or erase it everywhere all at once.

I am glad that you put so much effort into verifying my key. Cryptographic authentication is important in the small, to protect my account from theft, and important in the large, to ward off Faketoshi-style scams. However, neither johhny, Husna, nor I made any error here; and really, there was no need for you to out yourself in this thread.

Quote from: dragonvslinux on January 18, 2020, 12:37:55 AM

PS - Sounds like you're trying to a shill a shitcoin.

OK, assemble the evidence and tag me for it. If your evidence is good, then I expect that Lauda will step up and blast me to Hell. I will take a catnap whilst I wait.

With due apologies, I will now refocus on the thread topics: Timelord2067s vendetta over marlborozas masturbatory humour, suchmoons scandalous ulterior motives for promoting laughs, and Timelord2067s ~poor judgment (or worse) in basing tags on Quicksold nonsense. At least, one of those is not funny.

Quote from: marlboroza on January 18, 2020, 01:20:14 AM

Well, he can read everything in this thread and respond. It is up to him now to react.