I noticed.


I think that’s reasonable, as is the statement in your tag.

For my part, I am still awaiting Timelord2067’s response.  As a matter of principle, I always try to see what an accused party has to say for himself.  He has been online as recently as just over five hours ago, and he usually watches Reputation like a hawk; perhaps I am waiting too long, but I will err to the side of caution.


Over ten hours ago, I already took snapshots on the assumption that marlboroza would probably delete xolxol’s zero-content offtopic insults:
https://web.archive.org/web/20200118055900/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5218451.msg53635426#msg53635426
https://web.archive.org/web/20200118061229/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5218451.0;all

Off-topic:  I thank xolxol for bringing his account to my attention.


Edit 2020-01-19:  Snapshot of xolxol now whining with insults about marlboroza’s deletion of his prior whine with insults:
https://web.archive.org/web/20200119031414/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5218451.msg53642844#msg53642844
Full thread snapshot:
https://web.archive.org/web/20200119031421/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5218451.0;all



Hit nail on head.

---

Now that Lauda is here, the danger is that the hate-Lauda crowd will make the thread about Lauda.

The only part of Lauda’s post that was self-referential was the bit about hypocrisy, which I quoted above.  It was a reasonable observation, for what it showed about reluctance to tag Timelord2067, the subject of this thread.  Lauda otherwise discussed Timelord, and topics relevant to Timelord such as how best to apply the trust system, plus a request that the self-moderating OP retain evidence of deleted posts.

I know that the name “Lauda” is like waving a red flag before a bull, but please stay on topic.