hv_s latest post is hereby quoted fully without edits, and
archived before deletion, so that people can see a textbook example of an attempt to divert the conversation by saying a whole lot of nothingplus shifting of the burden of proof to everybody in the world,
i.e. alleging that it is everybodys responsibility to prove that Craig Wright
is Satoshi (!), wrapped in nonsensically misapplied technical jargon proof of work:
CSW has shown to lack the class of Satoshi.
This is what a lot of people fail to understand. At this point in time, even if Craig actually had and used the keys, that would be far from any proof that he's Satoshi. To be clear: It has gotten to the point where it is impossible for him to prove that he is Satoshi because of the very same reason that you mentioned.
Nope.
Satoshi delivered way enough
Its up to us to do proof of work and find out.
Connecting right dots, don't listen to fake news, read and understand sources
KISS
[...]
Should have asked him to sign a message from a known Satoshi wallet
[...]
Dont need CLUES, just one task, ask him to sign a message from a known Satoshi wallet
[...]
Great, ask him to sign a message from one of the Satoshi wallets
[...]
Did you ask him to sign a message from one of the Satoshi wallets?
[...]
and so on and so on until we get all the way into court and still the question is not being asked....
and the statement isnt being said, "if [Craig Wright] cannot access the wallets . . . sorry for your troubles, come back to us when [he] can"
Till then, on behalf of my esteemed brother /dev/null, I invite you to please enjoy the bitbucket. :-)
Meanwhile, a remark by Thekool1s set me about taking a closer look at some of what Craig Wright says about himself. I will post on that later. Spoiler: He says nothing that makes his claim of Satoshihood in any way credible, but he says plenty that exposes his deeper agendaa horrid agenda, even worse than greed for all that money he is trying to swindle out of the Bitcoin market.