Quote from: eddie13 on January 20, 2020, 07:26:04 PM

and has been mostly honest about their past mistakes

Are we reading the same thread? Hacker was everything but not honest, he posted one lie after another, yes, he "maybe" start telling the true, but it happened AFTER investigation start going deeper and deeper...and as you can see (if you can see) from that thread, investigation wasn't fully completed. It was just a scratch, if you are going to believe hacker's words that someone accidentally posted his info on reddit and some other things then you are more naive than I thought you are. Unless he bought this account, but he denied it, he signed message.

Quote from: eddie13 on January 20, 2020, 07:26:04 PM

After all, it seems that hacker has a pretty rough history of shitposting, plagiarizing, and bumping etc. but from what I see hacker has been turning their posting quality around since their early actions as a newbie

Except hacker wasn't a newbie, if you can please read that thread again OMG eddie13, what are you are writing here?

It seems? Huh

He took money to bump ICOs and some scams and write fake reviews and lied about it when he was asked..."today"!

What the fuck happened with this place?

I don't see anything wrong with this feedback

Quote

Maliciously merits what he/she knows to be a lie in order to propagate it and cause harm to me. Wouldn't trust as far as I could throw them, now should anyone trust a word they say.

"Liar merits a lie", unless you can tell why this isn't a lie?
"No one should trust word they say" - unless you can beat my facts in that thread?

You just can't admit lauda was right.