Quote from: suchmoon on January 21, 2020, 05:55:50 AM

Some totally unscientific numbers to complement the nice rainbow diagram above:


-                           |passphrais|immidiatel|boarder|rodger ver|monitory|underlying root cause|sow discord|maximum benefit of the doubt|
----------------------------|----------|----------|-------|----------|--------|---------------------|-----------|----------------------------|
passphrais                  |-         |2         |3      |3         |2       |2                    |2          |2                           |
immidiatel                  |2         |-         |11     |2         |3       |2                    |2          |2                           |
boarder                     |3         |11        |-      |5         |6       |2                    |2          |2                           |
rodger ver                  |3         |2         |5      |-         |2       |2                    |2          |2                           |
monitory                    |2         |3         |6      |2         |-       |2                    |3          |2                           |
underlying root cause       |2         |2         |2      |2         |2       |-                    |2          |2                           |
sow discord                 |2         |2         |2      |2         |3       |2                    |-          |2                           |
maximum benefit of the doubt|2         |2         |2      |2         |2       |2                    |2          |-                           |

I have to admit that the information in the OP once presented this way make a lot more sense than their original representation, also these "statistics" coming from a trusted person like you save us a whole lot of time confirming their integrity.

But this does not negate the fact that many members will still set the bar too low when it comes to "evidences" against users they have an issue with, and on the contrary, the bar "can" be set too high when it's about someone they "like".

In other words, I highly doubt that the same effort would have been invested if it was not Quickseller in question, I have not been here long enough but I can easily guess that Quickseller did a lot of "terrible" things to many of you, therefore, I can't blame anyone who will use everything at their disposal to "win" something against Quickseller. This should serve as a lesson to everyone, that sometimes when you make a mistake, it doesn't matter how far away you try to run, it will always hunt you down.