Quote from: nutildah on January 22, 2020, 12:29:16 PM

Quote from: figmentofmyass on January 22, 2020, 12:03:51 PM

@nutildah almost everything in my last post went right over your head. Undecided

Its not just me. Apparently you went over everybody's heads.

that's probably because nobody in the thread actually knows dick about forensic linguistics or statistical rigor despite the armchair expertise intended to show otherwise.

Quote from: nutildah on January 22, 2020, 12:29:16 PM

Quote from: figmentofmyass on January 22, 2020, 12:03:51 PM

the OP admitted he lacked proof but wanted to make the accusation anyway, just to see if it would develop into the downfall of PrimeNumber7

Not at all. Its because I want people to be aware that evidence of the connection exists. If I wanted to actively contribute to his downfall I would have neg tagged him.

it's much safer for you to achieve consensus first. that precludes any risk of having feedback countered or trust line exclusion or general drama around your judgment. group consensus is essential for mob mentality, which was the apparent object here since (as you acknowledge) proof was never on the table.

it's very transparent what was really happening here. i'm glad someone---TECSHARE---is willing to call it out for what it is.

some people are trying to act as if quickseller was such a huge scammer who scammed so many people out of so much money (), that it's vitally important that his alts be outed even absent any direct evidence. people who were active during quickseller's heyday can instantly see through that transparent posturing.

if quickseller had ever stolen money or actually achieved a long con, these low standards for evidence might be acceptable. in truth, people are only taking that line because quickseller showed himself to be an unhinged, sociopathic pain in the fucking ass (which is the true reason he fell from grace, not "forensic linguistics" or "self-escrow")---not because there is truly any moral justification. they are transparently just lynch mobbing because they hate quickseller. as TECSHARE notes, "scambusting" is the perfect veneer to engage in such behavior:

Quote from: TECSHARE on January 21, 2020, 11:57:40 AM

That is because they pick a target then arrange the "evidence" around them, AKA confirmation bias. This is just a convenient methodology to target people they have disputes with using the plausible deniability of "scambusting". They do it over and over again. Some one criticizes them or one of their buddies, suddenly they are all digging through all of their shit looking for anything they can manipulate to cast them in a bad light in retribution for daring to criticize one of the chosen.

Quote from: TECSHARE on January 22, 2020, 07:03:01 PM

Why would I waste my time disproving a premise you have the burden of proof on? This is a pattern of behavior among several "scambusters" here on the forum. They make accusations and just repeat them until people forget where it even came from and just act as it is now accepted fact. This is also known as operant conditioning, a primary technique used in propaganda and marketing.

quickseller is known for his ridiculous logical contortions and unproven accusations against other people. why reduce ourselves to that level?