You're missing the argument again.
No one here is arguing YoBit isn't a scam.
So, you are of the
opinion that the trust system should not be used to express distrust of the advertisement of acknowledged, undisputed scams!?
The remainder of this post is thus almost superfluous. As I wrote already before I saw your later post, not all opinions are equally valid. Next.
It's about the trust system becoming opinion-based versus the only credible trustworthy unbiased metric of trades.
Trade disputes are often just that: Disputes. Whether in good faith or in bad faith, parties interpret their terms of contract differently, differently interpret the facts upon which their contract must be applied (even when they agree to the facts), argue over the law that applies to the contract and to the facts, etc.
In actual courtrooms, such a dispute can and oft does result in a judge writing a paper that is called an
opinion to explain his judgment in legal terms.
In substantial effect, what you are arguing for is the abrogation of all standards, period. For ultimately,
reductio ad absurdum, everything in real-life human interactions is just a matter of opinion.
Not all opinions are equally valid.
Some of us obviously agree to disagree about the signature being worthy of a tag.
That proves it's an opinion and not a fact.
Some people disagree that the Earth is round. That doesn't make it any less of a fact.
And sane people do not waste time arguing with them (although they can be an interesting subject of sociological study).
Your meaning is unclear: Are you saying that the cold, hard maths that make Yobits advertised rates of return impossible are an opinion, or that it is only an opinion that the promise of impossible returns is a textbook, definitional scam?
This. I see a lot of posts saying that the clear facts I presented in my previous posts (
here,
here, and
here) are just like, my opinion, man, but no one has refuted a single one of them.
Thanks. I have also been intending to gather links to some of your older posts about the Yobit scam. Anybody arguing for Yobit should be required to first address the maths as a
threshold question.
That is not a matter of opinion, unless someone is of the opinion that the definition of the word opinion is arbitrary in the correct sense of the word arbitrary, not the arbitrary sense of TECSHAREs opinion about the meaning of the word arbitrary. :-)