Frankly I don't understand what your beef is. Your negative was removed, and the YoBit signature campaign has come to an end. Why are you still arguing with people in this thread?
I am baffled as to the motive. All I can gather is iluvbitcoins says that the trust system is for trade only and not for scams even though its has been pointed out that is not the case entirely. It seems clear to me this goes beyond that because iluvbitcoins was offended by the way all this has unfolded, I cannot put it down to anything else.
If a user wears a signature in order to earn some mBTC he didn't scam anyone.
There is no proof in him damaging any users at all.
I want to make sure I'm understanding you correctly here. Your argument is that people who promote a scam can't be held accountable as there is no proof their promotion was responsible for users falling victim to said scam?
That is precisely the point.
The view held by iluvbitcoins has been stated in the now deleted post but I had replied beforehand. In it iluvbitcoins stated: "Participating in signature campaigns, even if they are ponzis can never be equivalent to scamming.":
Nonsense... your motives are not about my sending PMs. The PM I sent to all 12 users requesting they remove the x10 banner is copied in the OP.
a person that's proven his honesty a million more times than you ever will, and you're purposely missusing the trust system.
That is your opinion. Feel free tothink what you like.
Participating in signature campaigns, even if they are ponzis can never be equivalent to scamming.
You are wrong. Promoting a signature that is a ponzi makes the promoter complicit.
It's sale of ad-space. Is PornHub a scammer for allowing dick enlargment ads?
This is Bitcointalk Forum not any other website. Promoting a banner run by company which steals from people who think they are investing in a legitimate scheme is akin to being party to the scam.
*has sent a PM
That's all I wanted to post.
This sort of self righteous bullying all over the forum needs to stop.