I look much more seriously upon frivolous positive feedback than upon questionable negatives.
I am liberal with negatives [1]
I will remove my counter if figmentofmyass, eddie13, and BayAreaCoins all remove their positive countersand not otherwise. [2]
and will exclude nullius if that red trust remains.
Will you also do ~figmentofmyass and ~eddie13?
[3]
Most of my positives (including one from a moderator) are for my technical expertise [4]
The trust system has evolved [5]
1. Then expect to be ~ because frivolous negatives are much more serious than frivolous positives..
Positivs can be left for something as simple as "This user seems smart", while negatives absolutely should be held to a much higher standard..
Your personal opinion on this matter matters little..
2. Sure, as soon as Lauda and Vod remove their BS negatives on TS..
If you would like examples of why both of their ratings should be highly questioned due to blatant abuse elsewhere, LMK.. (added to the end)
3. I doubt it..
4. You mean all your
frivolous positives you have received for non-trade related subjects?
5. We are constantly evolving the trust system to what the community consensus sees fit.. The "laws" have not been drastically rewritten in any gamechanging way allowing for the frivolous use of negative trust..
______
Here in this post are good reasons users should doubt ratings left by Vod..
Vod being a liar is without question
And here..
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5206862.0Are good reasons users should doubt ratings by your favorite buddy Lauda..
Should I place these references on their trust walls to warn unsuspecting users such as yourself Nully?