Re: Trust-system abuser TECSHARE accuses nullius of trust abuse—qelle surprise!
2. Sure, as soon as Lauda and Vod remove their BS negatives on TS..
If you would like examples of why both of their ratings should be highly questioned due to blatant abuse elsewhere, LMK..
So you're saying that I can write the same stuff, infinite number of times (i.e. even reslap the same rating) as long as it is neutral? Watch what you're preaching for. If you would like examples of why both of their ratings should be highly questioned due to blatant abuse elsewhere, LMK..
One thing that I've read between the lines over the last couple of months that you all explicitly or implicitly agree that there is no such thing as a frivolous neutral rating, even if everything in it is a complete and utter lie which is an interesting (conscious or subconscious) stance to have.
4. You mean all your frivolous positives you have received for non-trade related subjects?
This is incorrect. People are more likely to be actually trustworthy based on these long-standing ratings (i.e. continued display of X) rather than someone who just farms up with pajeet trade-deals. People really need to learn how to exercise caution when giving out positives.counter feedback is the only thing one can do when they see inaccurate/undeserved feedback (besides ~), so nobody should be surprised that it's done.
Again, doesn't exist. Keep in mind that I'm not arguing anything in relation to OP's claim or against it.