Quote from: Lauda on January 28, 2020, 09:09:14 PM

Quote from: TECSHARE on January 28, 2020, 09:04:19 PM

Quote from: Lauda on January 28, 2020, 07:53:02 PM

Quote from: iluvbitcoins on January 28, 2020, 07:50:08 PM

A joke.

< Yeah, dude, our trust system is totally fucked!

Nobody sane is going to give you credit for having the opportunity to steal and not stealing.

That is LITERALLY the point of the trust system. Some one is entrusted with funds, they have the opportunity to steal, they don't and then fulfill their obligation, thus proving them trustworthy.

Wrong. Nobody in their right mind would actively entrust him with a million dollars, he just happened to end up in that situation due to many externalities. Doing good can be proof of good, not doing bad is not proof of good.

Quote from: TECSHARE on January 28, 2020, 09:04:19 PM

Quote from: Lauda on January 28, 2020, 08:04:49 PM

Quote from: iluvbitcoins on January 28, 2020, 07:59:55 PM

Quote

Right so let me get this:
1) I clicked the link on your signature because it promised me money.
2) ~~I invested money under this 10% daily promise.~~
3) ~~Because this is a scam ponzi, I lost all my money.~~

~~There's~~ no crime, ~~right? You are not directly responsibly for me~~ landing on the website~~, right?~~

I gave you the option to visit the website.
Visiting websites is not a crime.

Now I'm 98% inclined to give you a negative rating.

Threatening negative ratings because people disagree with you. That is a good look Lauda.

It's my "opinion", not a threat. See how this works nicely when you selectively enforce it, like you are (or he is)? Roll Eyes

No one said anything about proof of good except you. The point was this is the entire meaning of the function of the trust system no matter how much you attempt to distract from this fact. it is meant to serve as a log of times people COULD have stolen but didn't, proving they have a history of being able to be trusted with funds.