Wrong. My rating on Kalemder is more than accurate, and it's further extended by things that you are unfamiliar with. DYOR before claiming my ratings are invalid.
How can he DYOR... DHOR if the things he's unfamiliar with are not present in your feedback or in the reference post? Either put it out there or hold the red paint until the "investigation" is complete.
See my update, which was just shortly before you responded. Also, you did not complain this much about any unstated evidence on PN7 = QS. This is
a double-standard.
(deceptive behavior is appropriate reasoning),
Also, DYOR =/= following my reference.
you're essentially arguing from authority, say
Statistical evidence of success (and/or withholding knowledge) =/= arguing from authority. It's again one of those times, one we had last month. The rating on Kalemder will stand.
Good example @OP:
PHI1618. See here why I tagged him: (
Reference).
This is how I tagged him:
Abusing/farming/circle-jerking merit; possibly even selling. Avoid like the plague.
According to the last update on
Loyce's website, there's this:
Seriously? Those arguing against it: Find a single, objectively non-deceptive, and objectively non-malicious reason for this and I will reconsider my tag (even though this is a single example of many).
Many post updates, please update only to latest.