Quote from: suchmoon on January 29, 2020, 06:41:19 PM

Quote from: Lauda on January 29, 2020, 06:34:28 PM

Wrong. My rating on Kalemder is more than accurate, and it's further extended by things that you are unfamiliar with. DYOR before claiming my ratings are invalid.

How can he DYOR... DHOR if the things he's unfamiliar with are not present in your feedback or in the reference post? Either put it out there or hold the red paint until the "investigation" is complete.

See my update, which was just shortly before you responded. Also, you did not complain this much about any unstated evidence on PN7 = QS. This is a double-standard.

Quote from: Lauda on January 29, 2020, 06:34:28 PM

(deceptive behavior is appropriate reasoning),

Also, DYOR =/= following my reference.

Quote from: figmentofmyass on January 29, 2020, 06:43:38 PM

you're essentially arguing from authority, say

Statistical evidence of success (and/or withholding knowledge) =/= arguing from authority. It's again one of those times, one we had last month. The rating on Kalemder will stand.

Good example @OP:PHI1618. See here why I tagged him: (Reference).
This is how I tagged him:

Quote

Abusing/farming/circle-jerking merit; possibly even selling. Avoid like the plague.

According to the last update on Loyce's website, there's this:

Quote

Trust list for: TECSHARE (Trust: +31 / =4 / -3) (~~DT1~~ (-4) 618 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP) (created 2020-01-25_Sat_05.12h)
TECSHARE Trusts these users' judgement:
75. PHI1618 (Trust: # +0 / =0 / -1) (937 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

Seriously? Those arguing against it: Find a single, objectively non-deceptive, and objectively non-malicious reason for this and I will reconsider my tag (even though this is a single example of many).

Many post updates, please update only to latest.