Also, DYOR =/= following my reference.
since i can't find any evidence, i can only speculate. i don't see anything obvious besides perhaps him having trust inclusions that you didn't/don't like (like tecshare and Vispilio).
you're essentially arguing from authority, say
Statistical evidence of success (and/or withholding knowledge) =/= arguing from authority. It's again one of those times, one we had last month. The rating on Kalemder will stand.
isn't that just saying "trust me, i've been right before"?
Seriously? Those arguing against it: Find a single, objectively non-deceptive, and objectively non-malicious reason for this and I will reconsider my tag (even though this is a single example of many).
personally, i add people to my trust list where i want to see their feedback + those they trust by default. i exclude people for the same reason. is that provably malicious or deceptive?
I'm still looking for a good ref to evidence against Kalemder..
I don't understand it..
+1