Quote from: Damnnnn on January 31, 2020, 05:14:50 AM

Quote from: ChuckBuck on January 31, 2020, 05:05:26 AM

First, I will not evaluate the criteria that a manager will choose someone. Next, there is no injustice here, managers have the right to choose those that they feel good.
In this case, we should discuss why those members are accepted, definitely, there is shady here.
There are a total of 11 pages of applications in the campaign Shocked

He can choose anyone better, who is always active. And now he accepts people who have been inactive for a long time. I wonder if there is any relationship between him and the people mentioned above? Huh

Or they are his alt accounts Huh

I think this should be investigated clearly, or at least he needs to explain Roll Eyes

I think it's clearly his alts. some of them apply on a lot of campaign and being accepted there even though their post history is filled with application.

You are right about the manager are free to choose what they feel is qualifying. So his preference is shitposter and inactive participants? This is so wrong for me, I see a lot of good poster there that is obviously more qualifying than those clowns.

it is his prerogative to choose whatever suits his standards. however, in doing so, it will build what kind of reputation he is as bounty manager. as he mentioned on his thread, you can pm him for any questions. so maybe, you can ask explanation from his side.
indeed, there are better and active posters that applied on that campaign but it is his campaign so he has the privilege to choose.
and if someone wants to investigate those users that got accepted, they are free to do so. anyway, this forum is open for those investigations.
just remember, in time, you will know what kind of bounty manager a user is and they will earn such respect from the community if they are being good about it!