Quote from: 1Referee on January 31, 2020, 11:26:54 AM

Quote from: hv_ on January 31, 2020, 09:57:03 AM

Nope - not for refactored BSV

It doesn't matter how you refer to BSV. It's still just a chain that's not actually being used. BSV's "use" at this point is a few weather and price fetching applications creating a lot of transactions non-stop. Is this the use you envisioned BSV to have?

Also, your master CSW absolutely hates USDT and exchanges, yet it's that exact stablecoin being used to pump the price of BSV on shady exchanges such as OKEx and Huobi.

https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/bitcoin-sv/markets/reported/

Compared to a large variety of altcoins BSV is slow, more centralized, not even the cheapest, not suited for complex applications, etc. How is the enterprise world going to use that chain with plenty of more suitable alternatives available. I'm not even talking about how toxic the backers of BSV are, which in itself is already a huge no go for serious businesses.

I fully agree that Bitcoin is all about real world use. - That would recommend wide compliance, stability and capacity and low price / efforts for risk assessments and transacting (needed for proper secure setups in industry use).

Trading / spec is not that much important - except of providing liquidity

We have no regulated exchange yet trading Bitcoin - but some are 'moving' - I bet complinace is the only reason that Bitcoin needs - I see that promoted only by BSV - so I support this - no matter who else does as well.

All the rest comes with industrial adoption