Quote from: FIFA worldcup on January 31, 2020, 04:30:38 PM

Quote from: ChuckBuck on January 31, 2020, 03:28:51 PM

Do you think this discussion should end here and this topic should be locked, Nullius Roll Eyes

We have achieved the final result as Lauda said

Quote from: Lauda on January 30, 2020, 06:09:24 PM

We have looked the other way, and will do nothing. That was the indirect consensus that was reached.

The problem of Yahoo and Yobit has ended, there is no reason for this topic to continue to be bumped by such boring analysis or silly posts as above.

This thread was started on January 23, 2020 and lucky the campaign ending was announced soon after that and the campaign was offline on Jan 27,2020. If the campaign was still continue, people might thought otherwise but now since the campaign has ended, the Yobit haters have been half cooled down and the intensity is quite less now.

While I am not a particular fan of Yahoo, I think he has some self control issues, but I don't think any of this was about hating on Yahoo. This was more about the fact that people are running around tagging a bunch of lower ranked users aimlessly but giving Yahoo a pass even though he ran the same campaign. I think this is a great example of the arbitrary and selective enforcement used in the trust system, and why we shouldn't be tagging anyone unless we can establish clear and objective standards regarding what is worthy of a tag. It is a pretty widely accepted legal standard that unless a person is made aware that a specific act is a crime, they shouldn't be penalized for it. It is a bit like police making up secret rules as they go that you are subject to. What could go wrong there?