Maybe 4 years isn't long enough to call this a witchhunt
What I said was
I can't properly remember but I think what you're referring to was in 2017, It was a Korean exchange that helped ION hit a high of $8
with a daily trading volume in the $millions. An un-forecasted opportunity that proved to be quite a lucrative one.
You then posted the conversation you lifted from discord confirming I was right. I suggest next time you post the evidence at the same time as your observations, that will facilitate a more efficient discussion.
BTW. I know exactly the point your making and it's a lame one.
No.
What you
actually said after that was:
You understood wrong, If you want to discuss please share your posts.
Look, I understand that the way this played out in reality doesnt fit the shiny happy everybody clapping hands and making millions of $s narrative that you want to spin this with, but the reality is:
- Ionomy asked for donations
- Ionomy took donations
- Ionomy sent donations to Korean exchange
- Exchange went bust, taking the donations with them
- Some of those who donated werent happy
Youre mistaking raising valid points, based on facts and observations of Ionomy over 3+ years, as being a witch hunt. I dont expect you to understand this, but there is a difference.