Quote from: altheshort on February 01, 2020, 05:36:59 PM

Quote from: korvas128 on February 01, 2020, 12:31:03 PM

Maybe 4 years isn't long enough to call this a witchhunt

What I said was

Quote from: korvas128 on January 27, 2020, 09:57:54 PM

Quote

I can't properly remember but I think what you're referring to was in 2017, It was a Korean exchange that helped ION hit a high of $8
with a daily trading volume in the $millions. An un-forecasted opportunity that proved to be quite a lucrative one.

You then posted the conversation you lifted from discord confirming I was right. I suggest next time you post the evidence at the same time as your observations, that will facilitate a more efficient discussion.

BTW. I know exactly the point your making and it's a lame one.

No.

What you actually said after that was:

Quote from: korvas128 on January 30, 2020, 03:37:25 PM

You understood wrong, If you want to discuss please share your posts.

Look, I understand that the way this played out in reality doesnt fit the shiny happy everybody clapping hands and making millions of $s narrative that you want to spin this with, but the reality is:

- Ionomy asked for donations
- Ionomy took donations
- Ionomy sent donations to Korean exchange
- Exchange went bust, taking the donations with them
- Some of those who donated werent happy

Youre mistaking raising valid points, based on facts and observations of Ionomy over 3+ years, as being a witch hunt. I dont expect you to understand this, but there is a difference.

This is fun Grin

What you see is your very first post that sets a trend. It's been almost 4 years now of this passive-aggressive FUD rubbish, aren't you bored yet.