Quote from: nullius on February 04, 2020, 11:24:45 AM

Quote from: TECSHARE on February 04, 2020, 05:57:33 AM

These two are having fun trying to reinforce each other's accusations without actually substantiating anything.

Who, me and Vod? What, you think were just buddies scratching each others backs?

For the record, I have exchanged with Vod exactly one private communication between 2018 and the present: A terse PM that I sent notifying him of this thread, with my apology for my message being about this. (It felt rude and excessively self-centred, because I had not sent him a hello since I returned from my long absence.) My communications (or lack thereof) with Vod are none of anybodys business; but I think I should anyway mention that, for reasons that will presently become clear.

Unlike suchmoon, I did not subsequently attempt lobbying him. If Vod has stood by his tag, it must only be because, well, its his tag, and he made it for reasons that he deemed sound in the first instance.

I supported, and continue to support his tag, because I believe it is correct: TECSHARE abuses the trust system. And my respect for Vod is only increased by the fact that he has stood by his own tag, when he could have easily thrown me under the bus to appease suchmoon. In terms that seem embarrassingly old-fashioned nowadays, he has principles! And if he refuses to delete a tag to avoid personal inconvenience, that indicates on the flipside that he does not issue tags for personal convenience, either: Regardless of whether or not one agrees with his standards, he applies his own standards impartially.

Whereas my treatment of this thread changed in the moment that I realized, I am not the one on trial here.

suchmoon has repeatedly evaded the unavoidable syllogism: If ~nullius, then ~Vod; if not ~Vod, then not ~nullius.

Suddenly searching post hoc for other nullian tags she disagrees with shows that suchmoon started with her conclusion, ~nullius, and then worked backwards to find some means to rationalize it without opposing Vod. It also shows how petty she is.

Dragging Lauda through the mud on this thread was irrelevantactually, off-topic. suchmoon has been ~Lauda for a long time. ~nullius ~Lauda would at least be consistentsomething that I could agree to disagree about, as long as its ~nullius ~Lauda ~Vod. No? Then leave Lauda out of it, just continue excluding her for whatever reasons or unreasons you had before, and exclude neither me nor Vod. Any discussion of Laudas tag thus is off-topic on this thread, as a moot point that need not be reached beyond the iron logic of the if ~nullius, then ~Vod; if not ~Vod, then not ~nullius syllogism.

I focus on suchmoon, because in substantial essence, this is suchmoons thread against me straight from post #2. TECSHAREs OP is meaningless junk laced with baseless claims that I am an alt of one of the usual membersjust another mundane daily whine from some idiot, not worth my attention. I would have ignored TECSHARE, whom I regard as a troll. I would have ignored anybody who usually supports TECSHARE. I could not ignore suchmoon.

But suchmoon is not alone in hypocrisy here: After so many pages of mostly nonsense, I must now also remark on how TECSHARE demonstrates his own hypocrisy by cheering as a big, bad DT1 plays favourites whilst beating up on the little guy. Aint that nice for you, TECSHARE? This is what you always claim occurs, even when it doesnt! Now, it is actually occurringand you think its just fine. Why dont you ask suchmoon to stop playing favourites, and treat the little guy the same way she treats the awesome 5-digit uid forum legend who founded BPIP?

Quote from: suchmoon on January 30, 2020, 10:10:34 PM

Actually I do like your true colors. A lot. I prefer honesty whether it's intentional or not.

Well, about that...

http://loyce.club/archive/posts/5374/53741462.html
(Immediately bookmarked by me in anticipation that it may disappear, as it did.)

Quote from: DireWolfM14 on January 31, 2020, 12:10:28 AM

Hey cryptocunt, you try two hardy notttalky the inglich good.

...also, back atcha: I am passing judgment on you on this thread, suchmoon. Not vice versa.

That's great. You are both very assured of yourselves. How about either or preferably both of you substantiate any of your claims, I mean like at all. All I have seen you do is demand the claims are true because Vod made the claim and he is intent on leaving it. That's called circular logic. You are literally claiming the thing is true because the claim that has been made is true.