Quote from: JaredKaragen on February 08, 2020, 03:25:11 AM

Quote from: TECSHARE on February 07, 2020, 09:27:32 AM

*snip*
Vod 2019-09-09 Reference "This profile has fundamentally abused the trust system, trading positive trust with as many others as possible to get on Default Trust. See reference and the BPIP DT Change Log for examples. Do not trust this profile's trust of others by adding ~TECSHARE to your personal trust list."

As you can see all of this happens within a few days of me again being put on the Default trust 1. Vod of course feels that he can personally dictate who can and can not be on default trust by manufacturing baseless accusations to cater the default trust to his liking, but of course I am manipulating it not him.

Quote from: Vod on September 07, 2019, 11:36:03 AM

Fine. If you want to abuse trust and throw away all your ethics just to get on DT; that is just your true nature.

But fuck off telling people to clean up their lists when you don't do it yourself.

Quote from: nutildah on September 07, 2019, 11:25:11 AM

Outside of OP's issue with ABitNut, this is exactly the kind of behavior that should be discouraged in the DT system.

Theymos has already stated the idiot TECHY has no place near DT.

I believe his ultimate goal is to make the forum collapse by making it difficult to do business here. We either do it his way, or we don't get to do it at all. :/

How am I making it difficult to do business here Vod? I can tell you how you make it difficult to do business here. An interesting concept also considering you don't actually do any business here, it seems decidedly more of a problem for me if it is difficult to do business here. Projecting again Vod?

ok, as an outside perspective: you showed the genesis; and retrospectively the neg trust, with its reference. I will be as pragmatic, kurt, and fair and impartial as I can. If you want me to give you the courtesy, do me the same and leave denigration at the door; stick to simple facts with references.

You say it is a feedback loop; but here's the rub... when I investigate this; I want to ask one question:

Is there a link to theymos stating Tech should not be on DT Vod? This would solidify the accusation of being substantially more than just plausible; and solidifies even more the need to have the below answered.

TEC: A deep explanation of how you formed these specific links to seemingly random people to get back on DT... is interesting to say the least; and I am intrigued to have cleared up and explained in detail.
This being if the above claim by Vod (an extremely trusted member) is true. Getting kicked off DT isn't a small thing, and it means a huge breech of trust.
It does seem fishy from a purely outsider "never been in the middle of this" situation. I have to be fair given the facts I can see ¿comprende? I'm not here to pick sides, I am here to get to the bottom of all this drama. We have had debates before and I have a level of respect for you; I'm not here for debates or flinging of whatever. I'm trying to solve some obvious problems cause people feel the need to air their laundry in the front yard sometimes so might as well look for the air freshener.

Now; I am assuming there was something substantial done in the past... which lead to you losing DT (either your action, or an accusation against you).

The simple fact that you got back on DT from a negative position, by means of such random accounts.... Does not add up at all no matter how I try to think about it, so thus why I asked you the paragraph above.
There was quite an effort put there to get on DT. I personally am curious as to why which the answered questions will give.

You seem like a reasonable person, and act with respect. I have no reason not to reciprocate. First, I would like to say that it is not upon me to prove my innocence, it is upon an accuser to prove the validity of their accusations. This is a base standard of any system of law or justice.

That said, if you review the original thread Vod bases his accusation on, you will see I made an effort to mutually resolve a conflict between members of the Turkish community and Timelord. This lead to several interactions with several of the members of the Turkish community, of which I gained respect for because of how they handled the response. I must assume they felt the same way and this is why they added me. I didn't do anything I wasn't supposed to and these accusations are nothing but a tall tale designed to make sure I wasn't allowed to be put back on the default trust instigated by people with very long time, publicly documented animus against me. In Vod's case his history of trust system abuse targeting me is well documented in this thread.