Quote from: TheYankeesWin! on February 10, 2020, 06:59:10 PM

Quote from: PassThePopcorn on February 10, 2020, 05:30:29 PM

Quote from: philipma1957 on February 10, 2020, 05:15:22 PM

Quote from: y_virtual on February 10, 2020, 04:50:38 PM

Quote from: -ck on February 04, 2020, 04:00:41 AM

Every bit's appreciated, but we really need more like 2EH.

So 2 blocks in one week with (less than) 2PH and then even less than 1PH... or am I wrong? At least that's what https://miningpoolstats.stream/bitcoin reported anyway...

BTW my recent observations on multiple pools reveal a completely different/opposite picture than the popular opinion goes. Looks like smaller pools with fewer competing miners improve the overall pool efficiency, I guess it could be due to small pools by design/usage "relieve" the inevitable technical bottlenecks any large pool has. Just an intuitive guess of mine.

certainly looks to be a reporting error on someones part.

blockchain.info has that block at unknown not ckpool

If you look at the "pool" that blockchain.com says found it, it is 32LA7cmsj35LH7cK1MjvwyoLEmYpuWAD9k which is also the top (#1) payout on ckpool. Not 100% on what it reports or who's account that is but it is a ckpool user at the very least.

I get this info

https://www.blockchain.com/btc/block/00000000000000000007c7186fd29956197dc96222b8db62334d73054efc33fc

https://www.blockchain.com/btc/address/3P8sR3K8wAk3bom7tqpr5VrzCz9TVYNTQd

that address you mention is here

https://www.blockchain.com/btc/address/32LA7cmsj35LH7cK1MjvwyoLEmYpuWAD9k

does not show a block for 616785

Hmm didn't know 616785 was one from ckpool, I just went to ckpool.org and clicked on the blocks found. When I reattempt now I get a different page that has the list of each block and not a redirect to btc.com/pools/ckpool like before. Kind of seems like a server error being thrown or something being changed.